Molly Gebrian - seven months later

Stub What MG has given me is permission to not work on everything every day. Before I felt guilty, but now I feel justified!

Me too. I still get a bad case of the "shoulds" sometimes but then I talk myself out of it because I know there can be benefits to letting something marinate in the background if I get excited about working on a new shiny piece (a near weekly occurrence...).

Pallas So what, sometimes I just want to play through and enjoy my pieces. It's not a crime!

Indeed...this may be the only piece of advice she offered that I have flat-out rejected. I am totally on board with focusing on trouble spots, and I've had good results recently with zeroing in on those exclusively for the first several weeks before I spend much time on the rest of the piece. But I'm not going to avoid playing through if I feel like it. I enjoy it too much, and my teacher expects it at every lesson anyway. I'm not walking into that unprepared.

I'm very bad at taking breaks during practice as I've always been, but am good about spaced practice (because it happens mutually in my life when I get busy) and sometimes there are many breaks of days when I don't practice at all. I try to keep it in my head to loosely follow her optimized schedule.

Generally I'm not randomizing my practice although I have my "trouble pages" (there are a lot of them, feels like every page is bookmarked!) flagged in forScore and sometimes I am doing random practice by jumping to those pages. I am also not doing repetitions the way she advises.

Old habits die hard

Pallas I don't like how it feels not to practice the way she's expecting.

This makes a lot of sense to me. As long one is paying a teacher, they ought to be largely following or aligning with their teacher. That doesn't mean not incorporating other teaching techniques, but I would want to prioritize the teacher's approach over other's.

Pallas Where I get really lost is when the notes are pretty solid across the piece and I start incorporating increasingly complex lesson notes (e.g., play through while vocally singing the treble line), but then mistakes pop up all over the place.

Yep, some how this is where I think Dr. G's approach falls short...

Pallas once you've learned the notes and the rhythm, the "real" work starts.

Exactly. I feel like her approach is really geared toward learning the notes and the rhythm, but I haven't figured out what her approach is for the next steps, for example when you're working on the whole piece.

Having said that, I haven't finished her whole book yet.

I do incorporate some of her practice techniques, and some are things I used to do and had gotten away from.

But I also want to re-read the Inner Game of Music, which I read so long ago that my memory is faint, but I'm wondering if that will round out the parts I feel are missing from Dr. G....

We'll see, I still need to finish Dr. G's book!

Pallas The main reason I stopped diligently Mollying is because I haven't figured out how to manage my workload that way and still meet my teacher's expectations that I work on every piece every day. I don't like how it feels not to practice the way she's expecting.

Unless your teacher wants you to practice the whole piece everyday, the Molly method means you can work on just a section of a piece. On rest days for that section, you can work on another section of the same piece, satisfying the expectation to work on that piece every day. If your piece is close to performance ready Molly even has the concept of interleaved performance practice.

As far as my own experience, even though I've been pleasantly surprised at how well I remember a recently learned section of a piece after her one or even two week rest period, for pieces at my lower intermediate level, a 2 week break just means it will take me that much longer to play the piece at an acceptable standard. I'm experimenting with 2-4 days in a row for a new section and combining it with the older section every other day.

I was most excited about using the method as a means of maintaining a repertoire of my favorite non-classical pieces. I'm happy to report that her schedule of 2-week rests followed by 3 days in a row of practice has worked really well for that. I still have a lot of my old repertoire to relearn, but for maintenance, the rest period employs the power of active recall and the 3-days of practice are good for fixing fractures.

I generally do this kind of reading at night, after piano practice, when my spouse and I are lounging are the living room. As you might imagine, I often find myself nodding off, so progress is slow

But anyway, I have both the Inner Game book and Gebrian’s book m, so I’ll get through them eventually.

@Pallas if you start reading the Inner Game of Music, be sure to share your thoughts!

I vaguely recall that I read The Inner Game of Music after the Inner Game of Tennis and I might have been vaguely disappointed with the music book. I think The Inner Game of Tennis is excellent, and pertinent...I try to re-read it once a year or so. It's basically right brain vs. left brain stuff, although I don't recall if that is explicitly stated. I am SO interested in that topic. I just waded through a monster book called The Master and His Emissary...there was so much info that I felt a little overwhelmed and I know a lot of it didn't stick, but I had to plow through on a schedule because of the library due date!

Pallas My inner game wants improving!

This is my biggest issue and I'm always reading or watching videos about the psychology aspect. Lots of work to do there...

ShiroKuro I never read the Inner Game of Tennis, but that was the original one and the Inner Game of Music was based on that, right??

I believe this is correct. The Tennis book was first and it may have spawned several others...

I also loved A Soprano on Her Head. Another one I need to re-read periodically and I'm overdue!

Pallas But it's been a while since I read the book, so if I've remembered wrong, please point out where I missed something.

Of course you can customize however you like! But if you are asking for what her recommendations are specifically, ermmmm.....it does seem like some of this is mixed up. I can't review my book for a couple days or I would help. I know she has a 3 videos specifically on blocked/random/serial practice too if that's easier.

Pallas starting with the most difficult, and staying with the same piece for larger blocks of time.

I used to always start with the hardest parts first. And certainly, it is ideal to spend more time overall on the harder parts.

But I don't know if it's because my pieces got harder, or for some other reason, but sometimes I find that I have more success if I start with an easier section of the piece. That works esp well when the hard parts seem just too hard. By working on the music in the context of easier passages, then, when I move on to the harder section, it often goes better.

Don't let this disrupt your planning though, @Pallas . I mainly mention it in case you sometimes feel it's easier to get into a piece through some other section. The trick is, as you say, to make sure that, over the course of multiple practice sessions, you're not spending more time on parts you can already play....

ShiroKuro I used to always start with the hardest parts first. And certainly, it is ideal to spend more time overall on the harder parts.

This reminds me of a video by Dr. Shijun Wang on how to learn new pieces. He suggests one way to help relieve performance anxiety is to learn the end of a piece of music first, then work backwards. This way, the latter part of the pieces gets more practice. Then during a performance, you become more and more comfortable as the playing progresses.

iternabe This reminds me of a video by Dr. Shijun Wang on how to learn new pieces. He suggests one way to help relieve performance anxiety is to learn the end of a piece of music first, then work backwards. This way, the latter part of the pieces gets more practice. Then during a performance, you become more and more comfortable as the playing progresses.

Yes! I first learned this idea from posts on PW (and I'm pretty sure people there were bringing in these ideas from Piano Street).

The idea is that as you move through the piece, you getting to sections that you've played more, rather than getting to sections that you've played less. And in a performance situation, that helps a lot!

I have gotten away from this style as well, but I should probably get back to it, or at least incorporate it partially... Esp with one piece I'm working on right now, where the whole piece is almost the same level of difficulty except for the very last part (the second and third to last measures)...

Somehow it takes a lot of discipline to practice this way... it's the same with truly incorporating Gebrian's ideas. It's just easier to start at the beginning and play through..

Animisha I purchased her book "way back when", because I am interested in the inner workings of the brain, and of course I'm interested in music. So buying her book was a "no-brainer", ok, "music-brainer", haha. This was well before it even started to get discussed in this forum - in fact I bought it because of a post in PW.

So I read her book. To me most of it sounded like a lot of common sense, wrapped in some "this is what scientific research says". I think that if someone were expecting a magic pill that would make learning music miraculously super easy or streamlined, then they would probably be disappointed. There simply is no such thing - because in the end, getting our fingers on the keys is what really counts. I have a feeling that's what you were getting at in your post, Nightowl?

Speaking just for myself, I haven't actually tried her suggestions. I'm just not into all this micromanaging etc and I continued to do what I did before: just sit down at the piano whenever I feel like it, play whatever I feel like and how long I'm in the mood for. That way I can enjoy my hobby without stress. I don't really care if my progress is slower than it could be... as long as I'm having a good time Because not having a good time leads to quitting pretty quickly - so I'd rather go a little slower than I might potentially be capable of, IF it means I'll be continuing