SouthPark definitely. Same here in the US as far as music stores. I shouldā€™ve stated earlier that I was mostly referring to acoustic. šŸ™‚

While on the topic of US, perhaps even further reason why Yamaha/Steinway stand out. Their marketing budget is quite conducive to US consumer propensity. Meanwhile Steinway perhaps has some underlying ā€œmade in Americaā€ aura about it and familiarity to folks in US.

(Totally generalizing here but thatā€™s one of my theories!)

Steinway is a famous brand. Kawai isn't a high-profile brand amongst the non-piano-playing public. Steinway is more like Fender.

On TV and in films I rarely see anything but Steinway and Yamaha. I see Bechstein in old British films and more recently in The Pianist and Florence Foster Jenkins. There's a BlĆ¼thner in Iron Man.

    My personal guess is that Kawai is for whatever reason uninterested in pursuing this market. Either they're unaware, or they are aware and are don't see viable commercial value, in promoting an SK-EX VST.

    I think the enthusiast digital piano market skews heavily in favor of Kawai (when you consider the multitude of acoustic piano makers, AND the digital makers who just offer an unnamed Steinway sample/reference), and because of that, many more digital players know of and appreciate Kawai, and would love a high quality SK-EX VST. But perhaps Kawai thinks of this as being direct cannibalization of their main hardware DP business, especially if they were to license/approve a 3rd party VST and just end up taking some meager royalties per copy sold. "Wouldn't we lose core DP sales if many people just bought a Roland A-88 or M-Audio/Studiologic keyboard and downloaded our golden tones"? Just a guess...

      Gombessa "Wouldn't we lose core DP sales if many people just bought a Roland A-88 or M-Audio/Studiologic keyboard and downloaded our golden tones"? Just a guess...

      I don't think so. If this would be a stategic decission, then why Yamaha hasn't come to the same conclusion?
      I own a Kawai digital because of the action. But my tonal preference is the brighter Yamaha. To be fair, the Kawai EX sample is something that isn't bad either, and kind of similar to the bright Yamaha sound. So I am absolutely fine how my CN29 sounds.

      About the presence of Kawai amongst non-musicians:
      I personally didn't know Kawai, before I bought one. As stage pianos/keyboards I usually remember Roland and Korg as a brands. And I knew Yamaha builds the best E-pianos (didn't know about the term digital piano, back then). I knew even the term Clavinova. And I knew Casio, but this brand was better known for calculators and cheap toy keyboards.

      Kawai? I guess I have seen this on a stage few times. But the presence was way less than Roland and Korg. (I also don't remember a lot of Yamahas)

      Killomiter Has James found his way on here?????

      Killomiter -- he is hiding!!!

      Interesting - he even has a star wars galactic republic symbol.

      Let me provide a different perspective.... I just started selling my piano libraries, and guess which one (by far) sells the best? Steinway. Does the Yamaha sell well? Yes, it sells, but not nearly like the Steinway. Does the Bosendorfer sell? Yes, but not nearly like the Steinway. Name recognition is extremely important, and I think Kawai, in terms of name recognition, ranks behind those three - so no one spends time to promote them.

      But with that said, it's funny that I was just at the Kawai flagship store in Omotesando/Tokyo in a private room with a Shigeru Kawai. I sampled it for fun. What will I do with the library? I'm not sure yet. I won't sell it, but I might give it out for free if I decide to distribute it.

        What do you mean no Kawai VIs. This one's kinda new and a bit spendy, but the demos I've heard are universally excellent.
        https://premiersoundfactory.com/piano-premier-kawai-legend/

        I shouldn't be too hard on you, I asked the same question on another forum: https://vi-control.net/community/threads/shigeru-kawai-sk-ex-anything.146761/
        That thread has grown to 9 pages and referenced a number of Kawai virtual instruments, including the one referenced above.

        Steve

          Pantonality What do you mean no Kawai VIs. This one's kinda new and a bit spendy, but the demos I've heard are universally excellent.
          https://premiersoundfactory.com/piano-premier-kawai-legend/

          So there is a kawai vst ... at least one. There will likely be more in the future.

          At the moment, I'm assuming it's not illegal to sample a kawai acoustic piano and then sell the samples or vst that uses those samples ... and calling it vst with kawai piano samples. Unless they somehow really manage to get some rules to inhibit that.

          It's sort of like sampling a car engine and exhaust etc sound, and then selling it ... with honest words about what car it came from. But we know those clever law makers etc ... coming up with ways to stop anything, such as even a rule stopping people from actually using others registered etc brand product names in advertisements and product details unless permission is granted etc.

          Some manufactures, especially Steinway, do not like VST developers using their name without permission. Some don't care. I got permission from Mason & Hamlin. They do not endorse the product, but they allowed me to use the name.

          HeartKeys When I tell folks about Kawai, they have no idea.

          We all live in different environments, have different friends and networks, but for folks who have no pianos, have no interest in pianos, within my world, almost none know about Kawai and most all know about Steinway and Yamaha.

          By ā€œknowā€ I mean whether theyā€™ve heard of itā€¦ that said they seldomly know of any other brands either.

          This is coming from me, who owns a Kawai, so itā€™s fair to say Iā€™m not being biased here šŸ™‚ I certainly wish Kawai was more known and renowned.

          johnstaf Steinway is a famous brand. Kawai isn't a high-profile brand amongst the non-piano-playing public. Steinway is more like Fender.

          Gombessa I think the enthusiast digital piano market skews heavily in favor of Kawai (when you consider the multitude of acoustic piano makers, AND the digital makers who just offer an unnamed Steinway sample/reference), and because of that, many more digital players know of and appreciate Kawai, and would love a high quality SK-EX VST.

          Agreed. And, itā€™s their acoustics I was referencing when I spoke about Kawaiā€™s market hold. In the digital world, Kawai is a power player. In the acoustic world, theyā€™re solidā€¦but they havenā€™t yet caught up to that name-recognition/household-name status of Steinway and Yamaha. And because VSTs tend to be aimed at capturing acoustic instruments, then naturally the most popular acoustic instruments would be the ones to get sampled.

          Interestingly, I think Kawai could catch up to the other brands, but I think their main issue is two-fold: a lack of wholistic focus on their prestige/history/legacy and a lack of a centralized identity.

          Sadly, for better of or worse, the acoustic piano world is heavily focused on ā€œprestigeā€ - whether real or manufactured. If you donā€™t have the omnipresence of a Steinway or Yamaha, you need to lean into the factors that makes your brand special. Bosendorfer, Bechstein, Bluthner, and many others did it for years - focusing on posturing themselves as the savoir-vivre/cognoscentiā€™s piano, leaning into their history, nationalistic overtones, unique colors/tones/timbres/woods/methods/blah, blah, blah lol. Kawai really only seems to do this these days with the Shigeru Kawai line. Meanwhile, their regular main Kawai line - the one they push the most - seems to have been relegated to averageness. The regular Kawai website seems looks plain and bland, like a Target website. Their in-person advertising is equally tepid.

          Also, for many years, most of the piano brands kept everything under a single names. They separated the levels of their instruments via model names and numbers (e.g.Model D vs Model A, CFX versus GC, 290 Imperial versus 200). Even with Yamaha, another piano maker who also does digitals, everything is centralized - thereā€™s just plain Yamaha. You want luxury, you got CFX. You donā€™t, you go GBK1. With their digitals, same difference: luxury is Avantgrands, top of the line is Clavinova, then thereā€™s everything else. But the pride, prestige, & the name recognition of the Yamaha brand, still carries regardless and is central on everything. Meanwhile, with Kawai, thereā€™s K. Kawai (for Koichi the father) but only on their grands, thereā€™s plain old Kawai on their digitals and uprights, and both these lines seem to lean into plainness with how they are marketed. Then thereā€™s the luxury Shigeru Kawai brand which gets all the prestige, but has a completely different logo (that doesnā€™t even look like Kawai). They roll out the red carpet for that line, but the other Kawai lines are kinda meh. Thereā€™s even some slightly confusing overlap with the naming, as there are plain EXs, but also SK-EXs. Itā€™s too much.

          Iā€™d love this to be centralized.

          Just make it plain old Kawai. Or combine the two: Koichi Shigeru KAWAI. Something. But they need a central brand and a central identity. And the entire brand needs to be wrapped up in history, prestige, and beauty. Look at how Bosendorfer associates themselves with Vienna, and using the finest Austrian wood, and being the heart of the Viennese people and ties itself deeply to the culture. Sad as it is, the classical worlds eats things like that up. Iā€™d love a centralized Kawai that leans into that, too. Build the mythos. Tell me the wood is straight from the forests of Mount Fuji šŸ˜‚. Hype up the story and mythos around the entire brand, the history, the culture, and the prestige, the way they do with the SK line. And, of course, start throwing some instruments at the competition circuit and the concert halls, the way the other brands do.

          The top instruments need to be slathered with the same luxury and prestige they reserve for the SK line. And start pitching them with the same pretentiousness the other brands use lol. And of course, there would be the lower-tier and affordable models. But do it how the other brands do it: get you in their dealer house with their prestigiousness, and if you canā€™t afford their $200,000 instrument, they take you into the separate rooms with the mid-tier, entry-level, uprights, and digitals. In that way, they maintain the ā€œprestigeā€ factor, but still donā€™t lose out on all customers.

          Pantonality What do you mean no Kawai VIs. This one's kinda new and a bit spendy, but the demos I've heard are universally excellent.
          https://premiersoundfactory.com/piano-premier-kawai-legend/

          I shouldn't be too hard on you, I asked the same question on another forum: https://vi-control.net/community/threads/shigeru-kawai-sk-ex-anything.146761/
          That thread has grown to 9 pages and referenced a number of Kawai virtual instruments, including the one referenced above.

          Steve

          Great point.

          I think itā€™s more fair to say ā€œthere arenā€™t many Kawai VSTsā€, and/or, there arenā€™t as many as the VSTs for the other, more well-known brands.

          Thereā€™s definitely some. They just donā€™t get the kind of attention or have the kind of numbers as, say, a Steinway or Yamaha centered VST.

          dore_m Let me provide a different perspective.... I just started selling my piano libraries, and guess which one (by far) sells the best? Steinway. Does the Yamaha sell well? Yes, it sells, but not nearly like the Steinway. Does the Bosendorfer sell? Yes, but not nearly like the Steinway. Name recognition is extremely important, and I think Kawai, in terms of name recognition, ranks behind those three - so no one spends time to promote them.

          Great context from an actual VST maker. And I think the same trend seems to play out with other VST makers as well.

            Taushi

            Kawaiā€™s logo/ font also does a disservice to its quality, from an eyeball test. It looks worse than generic to me. Iā€™d also say some other fonts, such as C. Bechstein also look generic, but their gold color looks excellent, as well as that crown thing.

            And Yamahaā€™s font is pretty bland as well but itā€™s also gold and the logo looks pretty cool to me. At least compared to Kawaiā€™s nonexistent one šŸ™‚

              Taushi I think itā€™s more fair to say ā€œthere arenā€™t many Kawai VSTsā€, and/or, there arenā€™t as many as the VSTs for the other, more well-known brands.

              I think it's more fair to say, "there are no professional sampled Kawai VSTs (that are sold for money)". With professional I mean to have acousticians, setting up the right microphone setup in a soundproofed studio room and have a robot pressing each key with a set of different velocities for recording. And this with and without pedal for the overtones. And not to forget making samples with the una-corda pedal, half pedaling... And then editing all samples to get the best range for the fade-out loop. And I think you need to have samples, when the tone is stopped (by the damper). Maybe taken at different tone durations.

              Nothing against amateurs and hobbyists, making their own samples, but I think if it is done by professionals with the purpose of selling it, the quality should be on another level.

                HeartKeys Haha, true. Red font on white background looks cheap. Even Casio looks more premium. I never realized how cheapish the Kawai logo is.

                Guess I am selling mine and get a Yamaha instead. šŸ˜…

                WieWaldi The Premier Sound factory library I referenced above is a very professional VI being sold for pretty serious money ($250 ain't bargain basement pricing) and it incorporates some technologies that are unique and extend midi technology. It's sampled at 96 kHz 24 bit and a "key striking device" was used in the sampling process. There is also a process to exceed the maximum velocity wall (midi velocity of 127). I have copied in text from the web site that explains this is more detail.

                "As you know the maximum velocity of the standard MIDI is 127. However, if the sound of a real piano played with full force is assigned to 127, it may frequently occur depending on the type of MIDI keyboard, resulting in a strangely stiff and unnatural piano sound. On the other hand, if ā€œmoderate strengthā€ is assigned to 127 in anticipation of this, you will feel like you need a stronger touch, especially in classical music.

                KAWAI Legend proudly cleared this problem. Regardless of the keyboard, if it has aftertouch after detecting a keystroke of velocity 127, our patented Velocity+ (VelocityPlus) feature engages a new functionality that effectively achieves a new maximum velocity of 254(127+127). This is done by detecting an overflow of velocity intensities of 127 by aftertouch (within 20 msec) and replaces the original 127 velocity sound with an extremely natural ā€œlimit-breaking soundā€ which is played according to the overflow degree. This product is equipped with three additional limit-breaking velocity layers after exceeding 127. It is also possible to monitor the value of Velocity+ in real-time.

                I don't own this library yet, but the demos sound extraordinary. I plan to acquire this at some point and hope there may be a Black Friday sale. At $250 it costs more than the Garritan CFX but with the extra velocity layers it could easily be worth it.

                Steve

                  Pantonality KAWAI Legend proudly cleared this problem. Regardless of the keyboard, if it has aftertouch after detecting a keystroke of velocity 127, our patented Velocity+ (VelocityPlus) feature engages a new functionality that effectively achieves a new maximum velocity of 254(127+127). This is done by detecting an overflow of velocity intensities of 127 by aftertouch (within 20 msec) and replaces the original 127 velocity sound with an extremely natural ā€œlimit-breaking soundā€ which is played according to the overflow degree. This product is equipped with three additional limit-breaking velocity layers after exceeding 127. It is also possible to monitor the value of Velocity+ in real-time.

                  Polyphonic aftertouch (sent separately for each key) isn't typically found on digital pianos. It's even uncommon on synthesisers, although that is changing. There's usually just one aftertouch sensor for the whole synth keyboard, and it sends the same message regardless of the key that triggers it.

                  Pantonality Maybe I should have been a bit clearer. When I said I mean a professional VI, I was talking about a VI that really sounds good. Something like Vienna Symphonic Library, offering Fazioli, Bƶsendorfer, Steinway, Yamaha, BlĆ¼thner (but no Kawai).

                  I did not mean professional in the case that someone earns money with a product or a service. For instance, a plumber does a repair in your home and wants $300. He offers you a discount of $50 if you are willing to clean up the water puddles that happened while the job (because he is short on time and must go to next customer quickly).
                  After you were cleaning up, you figured out, it does not get dry - there is water still a water-leakage somewhere...
                  Was the plumber a pro like professional? Obviously yes, because he is making a living of it. But was his work good?

                  Honestly, if I compare the sample video of the "Premier Sound factory" with the Kawai of Stu's video, the Premier Sound factory isn't worth its money.

                  Stu is playing:
                  Steinway D (Vienna Symphonic Libraries)
                  Yamaha CFX (Vienna Symphonic Libraries)
                  Kawai SK EK (Novus 5 internal sound, because he didn't get a good PC/MAC VI - my guess)

                  I mean, in Stu's video, all three pianos sound very good and also kind of similar. Non-harsh - they all were natural and pleasant. Even with headphones.
                  The "Premier Sound factory" on the other side is just overtones. Or did he play pedaled or half-pedaled all the time? And the 2nd half of the video is just a few jazzy dissonant short sounds with a very loud drum set overtoning everything. I guess there is a reason they included the drummer in the sample.

                  About this text with 127 MIDI velocity. Well, I am almost 50 years old and have a sense if one is telling marketing BS. On top of that, I am a software developer and can confirm this text does not make that much sense. Think about it, either the solution is simple and bulletproof like a no-brainer, then why didn't all the other VST producers do the same solution before? Or it is very error-prone, and they reduced the audible outcome to a minimum as if it is not implemented at all. Or - they are offering a "switch-off button" - maybe the most important button of all.
                  Seriously: They are advertising this feature in a way as they invented the wheel while the competition uses square tires. If it was really that outstanding good, it would be a game changer. If that was true, no-one would be talking about VSL, Garritan, Pianoteq or Ravenscroft anymore.

                  @Pantonality I hope you are not involved in the PSF company (earning money with it). If so, tell me and I delete my post ASAP.

                    WieWaldi I am not involved in any way with Premier Sound Factory. I asked them about the extended velocity feature. It uses the after touch signal to bring in the additional velocity layers within a matter of about 20 milliseconds, but I didn't ask if the feature was polyphonic. 20 milliseconds is plenty fast given the complexity of a piano's sound envelope. My guess as to why this wasn't done earlier is the requirement for Kontakt 6. I don't honestly know but suspect the capability was added in that product release. I have Kontakt 6 but none of the libraries I own requires it. Regarding the demos I would suggest going to the VI-Control thread I referenced above because a number of folks there bought the library and produced recordings that exceed what the company itself was capable of. I don't know the reason why that would be, it just is. Whether the library is worth the price they're asking I don't know, as I said above I'm waiting for a Black Friday or other sale because I don't really need another piano library. I respect Kawai and have played and greatly enjoyed some Shigerus (SK7 being the biggest) but not a SK-EX.