Memorization (when you hate it)
- Edited
Simonb There are no rules
Actually this forum has just one rule which includes "don't routinely make other people's experiences worse".
Instead of being given helpful advice we've been repeatedly told "there's no point in doing what you're doing", which is the opposite of helpful. Not every thread is a topic that's up for debate or an argument that someone "has to" win.
In a spoiler as I don't want to discuss this in this thread but I think it's relevant: I have seen an innocent question by a new poster at PW turn into a huge argument that has nothing to do with the original topic so many times, and is there any surprise that the OP never returns? I'm glad that this hasn't been allowed to happen here.
TheBoringPianist On the other hand, my sight reading is atrocious to the point that when I go to the local chamber music readings, I play violin instead of piano so I actually have a chance of keeping up
.
Oh, you're not alone in this-- I can sight read okay but definitely not well enough to read chamber music with others! At the ACMP play-ins here, the pianists are always assigned a group and choose their pieces in advance so that they can prepare.
Also, I'm always amazed at people who play very different instruments well!
TheBoringPianist I should really practice sight reading more often, but at this point after half a lifetime of dwelling on my weaknesses I'd also rather lean into my strengths once in a while.
Clearly your sight reading skills haven't impeded you very much 
- Edited
Edited.
I finally finished the video that @Josephine and @twocats recommended. Very interested and beneficial! I loved it where he was talking about what some kind of chord was, and how he was calling it a different chord, even though it was actually some other chord, and he just said "But I do not care." If a professional can take that lax approach, I think so can the rest of us! 
Joking aside, I implemented some of his suggestions last night during practice (as I was eating my one-quarter of a vegetable) and I think it was quite helpful. I tried to memorize an 8-measure passage focusing on chord and note names and even though at the end of 15-ish minutes, I wouldn't call it truly memorized, I noticed a lot about the music that I hadn't noticed when just reading the score. All in all, very useful!
ShiroKuro I started my score study this morning and I think my struggle is definitely going to be doing "bite sized chunks". I want to bite off more than I can chew!
Maybe my goal should be to limit myself to one phrase per day when I'm at the piano. That will force me to be more patient and I have so much other stuff to work on anyway and I don't have any short-term deadline.
Very few people can remember āallā the pieces they played. Depending on how a piece is arranged, there are some pieces you can sit down and work out the sequence by ear if you have good ears. I came across a lead sheet version of āSilent Nightā with several chords including C, G & F. There is a lead sheet version of the Simon & Garfunkel āSound of Silenceā with just 4 chords. I showed a friend who plays guitar: Dm, C, F & Bb. The melody with 5 variations is easy to follow by ear.
IMO you can train a student to be a good memorizer or reader early. While traditional piano lessons focus on developing reading skills, Suzuki requires students to learn the Book1 pieces by imitation off the teacher and soundtracks on a CD before learning to read. A student can be conditioned to listen to sound sequences and remember them. Itās like somebody talking about an article in a newspaper. We remember the content based on what was said than having to re-read the page to get something out of it.
The last piece I worked on was a Bach Bourree with 24 bars on 1 page. Has some awkward fingerings. Otherwise repeating the sequences by muscle memory isnāt too bad. Muscle memory is unreliable and requires regular repetition. If you havenāt played a piece for a while, you need to relearn some of the notes. The rest would come back quickly.
- Edited
twocats I think my struggle is definitely going to be doing "bite sized chunks"
I did some work away from the piano to define my sections for Chopin Ballade 2; hopefully others can learn from my mistakes!
I made the initial mistake of creating a forScore "page layer" when what I wanted was a "score layer" and had to redo some work. And then another mistake of defining chunks that were way too short in the easy part. I ultimately decided on shorter chunks for difficult sections and natural phrase breaks for the easier sections. Hopefully that amounts to a reasonable amount to memorize in a day. There are 30 total sections but there's some repetition, so when I encounter a repeated part that I mostly know I'll just work on an additional section on that day!
Update: I think having the ability to do layers is very powerful but the forScore implementation kinda sucks. Now that I'm done marking up my sections, I have to manually select the page layer on each page to get back to my original layer! I will have to double check at the top of the page to make sure that I'm marking up the layer that I intend to.
twocats I don't think you reached the stage where the piece became a part of you!
You are absolutely right, of course. I don't think that I have ever reached the stage where a piece became a part of me, not even the few pieces that I spontaneously memorised. Would it even be possible for me to reach that stage?
Interesting...
*
... feeling like the pianist on the Titanic ...
twocats Update: I think having the ability to do layers is very powerful but the forScore implementation kinda sucks. Now that I'm done marking up my sections, I have to manually select the page layer on each page to get back to my original layer! I will have to double check at the top of the page to make sure that I'm marking up the layer that I intend to
Thatās unfortunate. With Newzik, the layer setting applies to the entire piece (not individual pages). Iām not sure why they would design it to make you re-select a layer for each page.
- Edited
twocats Maybe my goal should be to limit myself to one phrase per day when I'm at the piano.
Youāll have to report back about how this goes for you. I know that with pieces that are sort of āin the pocketā of difficulty level for me (not too hard, but challenging enough to be interesting), I would want to press ahead. Or with pieces that are easy for me, I would read through and work on a huge chunk, or the whole pieceā¦. Especially because Iām lazy and reading is easy,Iām finding it hard to force myself to memorize the piece I decided to memorize.
BTW one thing Iām thinking about is the distinction between ālearning how to play a pieceā and āmemorizing a piece.ā In watching the video by Greg Niemczuk, itās earl that he doesnāt need to learn how to play that piece, he just has to memorize it, and then heāll be working on interpretation, musicality, expression. And with the piece Iām planning to play first in my recital next month, the āeasyā piece, I donāt really need to learn how to āplayā this piece. (Btw this piece is Wishing, by Ffrench, the first piece in my Journal thread).
But for other music I play, thatās not necessarily the case. For example, some music I struggle with choosing the fingering, or like Miracles (the Alexis Ffrench piece that Rubens transposed for me) I struggled with distributing the notes between the two hands ā¦
or Una Mattina (by Einaudi), I couldnāt play it until after a lesson with my teacher when he showed me a different way to count it. (Of course after that, it felt so easy, I felt like an idiot).
Hereās Una Mattina:
Anyway, I think, for me anyway, all this means is that I should choose the piece to memorize carefully, so that if my aim is to practice memorization as an exercise in and of itself, then I should pick a piece that I only have to ālearn to play it,ā rather than a piece that I have to ālearn how to play.ā
Does this make sense??
BTW just writing this post makes me think I really need to be firm with myself and try to memorize the whole piece for Wishing, not just a few sectionsā¦ Being a āreaderā makes me so lazyā¦
@Animisha and @Josephine I think I reach the stage where a piece becomes a part of me only after playing it a lot (and I donāt mean practicing it a lot), combined with recording or performing it for others, and also after learning it, polishing it, forgetting it and then bringing it back again.
I donāt think it has to do with how long someone has played in general, but more about how someone has interacted with that specific piece.
Although, in the contest of this thread, then maybe the question is, would memorizing a piece speed up that process, or would one still have to go through some of those other steps? I donāt knowā¦
- Edited
ShiroKuro @Animisha and @Josephine I think I reach the stage where a piece becomes a part of me only after playing it a lot (and I donāt mean practicing it a lot), combined with recording or performing it for others, and also after learning it, polishing it, forgetting it and then bringing it back again.
The only two pieces that stuck around since I was a teenager were pieces that I worked on for at least a year back then (and when you're young a year feels like forever) and memorized! I have to say that they're indeed a part of me because everything else has gone away but I can't seem to forget these if I tried.
@Animisha and @Josephine I do think it's possible for you to reach that stage, but you would have to keep working on a piece over a very long time, as SK said not just "practicing" but "playing". And I also agree that the act of putting something away and bringing it back solidifies it (Greg N. also talked about "forgetting" a section and "relearning" it).
ShiroKuro Anyway, I think, for me anyway, all this means is that I should choose the piece to memorize carefully, so that if my aim is to practice memorization as an exercise in and of itself, then I should pick a piece that I only have to ālearn to play it,ā rather than a piece that I have to ālearn how to play.ā
I'm doing both-- I can play the fast parts of Ballade 2 but slowly. It'll take a lot of work to get it up to speed, but I have stuff like fingerings and phrasing figured out already (Greg N. can do that on the fly but better for us if it's figured out in advance, I think). I'm hoping that the memorization will also help the learning process but we'll see!
ShiroKuro re the layers in forScore, that sounds frustrating, if you havenāt already perhaps you might try to google some how-to to make sure thereās not a trick youāre missing?
I'll Google, the software can't be that stupid, can it? 
- Edited
twocats I'll Google, the software can't be that stupid, can it?
I was thinking that the solution might be to only use score layers even for my markings (forScore defaults to a page layer) but apparently if you use multiple score layers there is a long-time bug where they might compress into one big score layer and you can't get it back. Or it doesn't save and is lost!!
And there's a person who reported that all their page layers got merged into one as well. I think it's minimal risk for these particular markings as they're easy to erase if needed but it looks like using layers for anything complex may be a little risky. I'm going to be backing up my .4sc individual annotation files more often!
twocats Good grief!! forScore is practically an industry standard! I don't have data but I would be willing to be it's the most widely used, and the one most used by professionals and teachers. You would think they could fix this....
Anyway, making a back up of the score and experimenting with the copy is the way to go of course.
ShiroKuro BTW just writing this post makes me think I really need to be firm with myself and try to memorize the whole piece for Wishing, not just a few sectionsā¦ Being a āreaderā makes me so lazyā¦
Looking at your markings I'm wondering if I should switch to letters instead of numbers, but then since I have over 26 I'll have to do AA, BB, etc at the end. Letters feel more "right" to me.
I definitely relate to the laziness! Yesterday when I was studying the score I actually found myself thinking "this is in F major, here it's a C chord so it's V (five-- relative chord)" and noticing that in a repeated section that Chopin has added an additional note to each chord. I would never have noticed this if I wasn't trying to memorize!
ShiroKuro I am sure it will. I just feel I'm too lazy right now to try to memorize a piece that I also have to more active learn the how of as well.
In my opinion you should start with a piece you already know and memorize that. That way there's less risk of memorizing it wrong as well!
ShiroKuro You would think they could fix this....
Apparently it never fully worked and iOS also keeps changing so the developers haven't been able to figure out a fix. My understanding is that to save time they compress everything to one layer and then uncompress it, but then sometimes it doesn't uncompress 
