keystring I would like top know whether Ms. Gaertner has worked one-on-one with students of different ages, over years, and in close communication with them including how they practice, their sleep patterns, their experiences and so on.

The only part I know is that she has worked one-on-one with students (children). I cannot answer your questions.
I agree that studies are limited, but I think that they can give a lot of interesting information. Especially when a study confirms my own experience - I never have experienced any improvement even after a good night's sleep.

*
... feeling like the pianist on the Titanic ...

    I think it's possible to overthink practice methods and worrying about whether or not "sufficient" progress is being made in a given amount of time. There are so many variables to consider: sleep; stress; physical condition; age; enthusiasm- both long-term and short-term; whether or not the particular piece of music you're working on is appropriate or particularly difficult given your technique; size and shape of your hand and length of your arms; talent and agility; fine motor coordination and eye-hand coordination...... And probably a lot more!

      Animisha But I guess the answer is within you. What happens the next day when you practise again a passage that you practised yesterday? Do you see an improvement? Then your brain is still young!

      This just happened a few days ago! I kept hitting the wrong notes despite it being a slow passage, as it was just not an intuitive progression. But the next day I could play it cleanly!

      Ahhhhhh now I am scared of this aspect of ageing, aside from all the little things that I am starting to experience and am offended at my body for πŸ˜‚ (I apologize for making this complaint to people much older than me!)

        Well, I know that my memory now is not as good as it was 10 years ago, let alone when I was a teenager and could pass exams with minimal last minute revision. So I think it's true that neuroplasticity does reduce with age and for that reason mature adults are wise to accept that learning a new skill may take them longer than others who have youth on their side. However, what a mature adult lacks in neuroplasticity can sometimes be compensated for by a higher level of patience and commitment, and a willingness to stay the course. Also, there is a theory that learning new skills encourages the brain to form new connections, which may help to retain neuroplasticity. We can but hope. πŸ™‚

        "Don't let's ask for the moon, we have the stars." (Final line from Now,Voyager, 1942)

        Animisha Especially when a study confirms my own experience - I never have experienced any improvement even after a good night's sleep.

        Here's something that I've found quite effective, which hopefully might help. Play the piece you're working on right before you fall asleep/ listen to it and have it in your ear. If you dream about the piece, it should improve by the next day from what I've read. It's possible that the lack of consolidation due to sleep is because of all of the interference of competing information during the day.

          Animisha Tara writes this blog in 2017, when her oldest child is 14 years old. She writes: "While my sense of pride wants me to point out that I don't actually fall into the category of "older adult", I'm not as young as I used to be, and clearly that makes a difference in how my memory processes function."

          I find this to be a kind of hasty generalization, and here's why:

          The study says that adults in a given age group, on average, given a certain level of commitment, tend to consolidate memory in a specific way.

          Often, I find that in public talks/blogs, psychologists/neuroscientists start to give their own anecdotes. Like, we all feel like we've slowed down with age, haven't we? Etc.

          But in science, one person's anecdote doesn't mean much. So I personally find this a little irresponsible on their part. Their personal experience has nothing to do with the study.

          There is considerable variability in how different people's brains age. To take an extreme case, Arthur Rubinstein, for instance, seemed to retain his near-photographic memory until the day he died in his 90s. There are many people on these forums who have said that their memory in their 50s doesn't really feel slower or any different than it did in their 20s (they can still learn a concerto within a couple of weeks and so on), and I have met people in real life who have said the same.

          Scientific studies "clump" all of this data, and artificially make it seem like the average is a "universal" facet of how humans work. I believe this is what keystring was alluding to as well.

          And there are certain factors not being controlled for here: How much has the person in question tried to maintain her memory? How much does she actually use memory in her day-to-day? When looking at older adults, for instance, the idea that there tends to be some decline in memory function is rather "common knowledge". But we shouldn't confuse that to mean that there MUST be decline -- those are two different things.

            Just wanted to add to the above, I have nothing against the research presented. I would just be very careful about using research to describe things which happen to you personally, because it is very easy to limit yourself by thinking you can not do something because the "research" says so.

            pseudonym58 I think it's possible to overthink practice methods and worrying about whether or not "sufficient" progress is being made in a given amount of time.

            On the one hand, I agree with this (overthinking).... but on the other, I spend a lot of time practicing. If I can do something to make that time more beneficial to me, then I want to do that. For example, years ago, I learned that I get better results by breaking up the score and practicing a piece in sections. So I've been doing that for years, not because I like playing 8 measures 10 times in a row, but because it allows me to learn music more quickly. And it was an easy tweak to my practice routine.

            Now I've been reading Dr. G's book, and I'm starting to add some of her suggestions as well.

            I also have found that I progress more, get through more music, and have more fun when I take lessons. I've been playing for 25 years now, so there have been stretches of time when I didn't or couldn't take lessons. But I'm back in lessons again and (as you know if you saw my other thread) loving it!

            I don't think that tweaking my practice habits or prioritizing taking lessons are examples of overthinking. They are examples of trying to maximize my pianistic success. And I keep doing them because I can see the benefits.

            BTW, I don't know if my "memory" has diminished from when I was in my 20s... But I don't really care. I play from the score. πŸ˜ƒ Only half joking here. Memorizing pieces has never been a big goal of mine.

            More to the point, it's clear that my brain is really good at learning (which I'm sure means it has a good memory, but this is different from "memorization").... Anyway, I am an academic, and I'm bilingual. I teach, research, and write for my job. And I plow through new music for my hobby.

            I'm sure there are ways my brain is changing, but I don't notice a decline (yet!)

            I do try to be healthy, which include not just sleep but also exercise. I'm very conscious of all the things my brain lets me do, so I want to take good care of it.

            One more comment... It's been a while, but I thought I read about the idea that neuroplasticity may last longer, and be able to be "restarted" than was previously understood. In other words, there's no expiration date on neuroplasticity, and being active (physically and mentally) contributes positively to an individual's neuroplasticity...

            So I'm not going to assume that my brain is losing plasticity just because I'm getting older.

            Animisha Do you see an improvement? Then your brain is still young! ☺️ Or do you start at a lower level? Then your brain is older.

            How about I see improvement over where I started yesterday, but not over where I ended yesterday?
            But then, I'm only 77 so I'm way too young to consider mental deterioration πŸ˜‰

            I have been reading Molly's book and experimenting with some of the strategies. Especially as to not practicing the same stuff every day, taking micro breaks, etc. So far I find them useful.


            Make a joyful noise...
            Jane - expert on nothing with opinions on everything.

              Can't go back in age but have to keep up with regular exercise, playing music and whatever else it takes to keep the mind sharp.

              Unfortunately getting enough sleep is always a problem. Having relatives in other places means frequent travels out of town and in different time zones. Flying out of country a few times a year is a problem when you age.

              twocats Ahhhhhh now I am scared of this aspect of ageing, aside from all the little things that I am starting to experience and am offended at my body for πŸ˜‚

              I hope you don't forget to enjoy while it lasts. I don't know if this is a comfort, but it all changes very gradually.

              *
              ... feeling like the pianist on the Titanic ...

              ranjit Play the piece you're working on right before you fall asleep/ listen to it and have it in your ear.

              That would interfere with my sleep... I need to wind down before falling asleep.

              *
              ... feeling like the pianist on the Titanic ...

              • TC3 likes this.

              Jane Animisha Do you see an improvement? Then your brain is still young! ☺️ Or do you start at a lower level? Then your brain is older.

              How about I see improvement over where I started yesterday, but not over where I ended yesterday?

              Jane, you cut my quote. There is not a doubt in my mind that also older people improve. My full question was: "What happens the next day when you practise again a passage that you practised yesterday? Do you see an improvement? "

              *
              ... feeling like the pianist on the Titanic ...

                So, for @Animisha re whether there’s improvement from one day to the next…

                You say you’ve never experienced that improvement from one day to the next, I assume you mean that dramatic improvement where something you couldn’t play yesterday, now today you can play it?

                Or do you mean, you worked on something yesterday and over the course of the practice session, it got better, and then the next day they improvement seems to be gone and you have to work to get it back again?

                If the latter, there are a few other things you might add to your practice routine and see if they help. (For anyone curious, I got a lot of these ideas from Piano Street way back when everyone on PW’s ABF was going over to Piano Street and getting tips from the poster Bernhard, or was it Bernard? And then posting his tips over at PW)

                Anyway, say you’re trying to get a 4- or 8- measure passage into your fingers and you have a goal of MM=120.

                So you practice it for 20-30 minutes, breaking it down, confirming the fingering etc. and then you spend some time slowly cranking up the metronome. By the end of your practice session, you can play it about 120, you turn off the metronome and you play through that passage and it’s quite nice, feels solid, and pretty close to the tempo you want.

                You end your practice session, but when you sit down to play the next day, suddenly you can’t play it close to that tempo that you got to yesterday and some of the problems you worked out yesterday, problems that you thought you got rid of, are back.

                Here is a trick to counter this kind of problem. Go back to yesterday’s practice session, do everything mostly the same except for how you end the session. At the end of the session, after you’ve got the passage up to mm=120, slow it down again before ending your practice session. Practice it through once or twice more, but v e r y . s l o w l y. And make that slow practice the last thing you do with that piece for the day.

                That’s it, that’s the trick.

                There seems to be something about doing this that helps cement the learning of that passage in your head. And at the next practice session, it’s much more likely that the gains you made the day before are still there, and you can still play it up to that tempo.

                I used to do this all the time, and especially before a performance or recital, I would make sure the last thing I did at the end of a practice session was a very slow practice of the tricky passages or trouble spots.

                I have gotten away from this because my needs have changed as I’ve gotten better, but actually, maybe I’ll add this back to my practice routine again. Esp since I’m going to be playing with a cellist soon and I may actually have a performance opportunity in November (which would be the first time since the pandemic!)

                Anyway, @Animisha if you haven’t tried something like this, try it and let me know what you think.

                πŸ™‚

                  Oh and two more details about this practice approach:

                  1. If you practiced with a metronome the entire practice session one day (which I don’t recommend), and then the next day you try to practice without it, it might not go well just because you’re suddenly dependent on the metronome. It’s important to be able to practice with a metronome, it’s a helpful tool. But it’s also important not to get dependent on it.

                  2. Slow practice is such a helpful tool. If you have trouble at the beginning of a practice session, maybe you’re starting too fast at the outset. So not only is it good to do slow practice at the end of a session, it’s also good to make your first play of that passage the next day a slow play as well.

                    Animisha My full question was: "What happens the next day when you practise again a passage that you practised yesterday? Do you see an improvement? "

                    I will answer this. Again, I've worked with these concepts for quite a while, and it took time to "get" some of the aspects.

                    Two elements are (i) 'practice' (the goals you're practising toward and how), (ii) improvement - what that means.

                    The goal in the short, focused practice sessions are reachable goals. You're not practising to "not make mistakes", which is a negative, or to "play correctly" or "play well" which are too broad and undefined. It's specific - these few bars, and what you're aiming for in those bars. A lot of my own goals are physical because of how I started and the debris still being cleared away.

                    Recently I worked on a two-measure passage in a Chopin etude that goes to my weaknesses. These two measures are an anomaly in the piece. In a flurry of 16th notes, the top of each set of 4 notes has to be loud, the others soft. My RH middle finger kept being too loud - because I was leaning on it to jump to the pinky , it turned out. So I invented an alternate rhythm, found better ways to use the hand, and practised that. My concept of pedal was wrong, so that was an isolated practice in the mini-sessions.

                    The broader goal, then, was to aim for a final tempo that wouldn't be what professionals can do (that's for another time), and to be able to play those two measures acceptably at that tempo. The SMALLER goals were to
                    (1) get the pedal timing right
                    (2) get the emphasized notes above the quiet notes - within the alternate rhythm
                    (3) on another day, can I do this with a normal rhythm

                    There were subgoals under those goals.

                    So to answer the question with that in mind:

                    "What happens the next day when you practise again a passage that you practised yesterday? Do you see an improvement? "

                    Yes, from one day to the next, these smallish and concrete goals were there for me the next day, to build on. The package contains all of that.
                    Since I record results often I can actually show this literally.

                    September 30 - rhythm, so as to solve the problem of pounding out the wrong notes (the previous day, not recorded, those other notes were way too loud. - 2 measures - the pedal timing was wrong however (to fix next day)
                    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/bfb32bn23xd8xwrtq37i7/24.09.30-oceansTrial.mp3?rlkey=ol6etk5w36zd4d2d5m13lbfw1&st=vbzz2hhq&dl=0
                    October 1 - change pedal choices; when I went to practise this, what I had done the day before was "there for me", and I could build on it. RH alone - then HT added. The LH starts lagging in the 2nd half.
                    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/1humky9rrnt6sjmqpjs0b/24.10.01-Oc-again.mp3?rlkey=x5yxuol2ghfh6t7pzkkc5go25&st=vt0kyvpx&dl=0
                    October 2 - trying to apply this to normal rhythm. I could not get it quite at the same tempo as the rhythm-practice, but a fair bit faster when first testing this, and without middle notes blasting out. Solved the LH lag in that practice session, by looking to why & addressing it.
                    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/unu8hs9jeu44k9hz7cbcd/24.10.03-Oc-that-section.mp3?rlkey=tuvqep1d8gx9njdnyd8kbcsne&st=x0jbxab9&dl=0

                    So over the course of three days, each day the thing I aimed for the previous day was there for me the next day and had gelled. Each day I could build on those things. It involved only 2 measures, and a difficult (for me) spot. By pure chance I happen to have recordings three days in a row.

                      @keystring Did you come into this approach on your own, organically, or did you learn about it?

                      I ask because I'm reading Dr G's book, and what you described is exactly what she recommends in terms of goal setting for practice sessions.

                      However you came into this practice approach, congratulations, because it's a very systematic way to do it. And, even better, very effective!

                        ShiroKuro Or do you mean, you worked on something yesterday and over the course of the practice session, it got better, and then the next day they improvement seems to be gone and you have to work to get it back again?

                        Exactly!

                        ShiroKuro getting tips from the poster Bernhard

                        I remember the mysterious Bernhard...

                        ShiroKuro At the end of the session, after you’ve got the passage up to mm=120, slow it down again before ending your practice session. Practice it through once or twice more, but v e r y . s l o w l y. And make that slow practice the last thing you do with that piece for the day.

                        That’s it, that’s the trick.

                        Thank you ShiroKuro, that sounds like a great trick! I will do this in today's latest session.

                        ShiroKuro It’s important to be able to practice with a metronome, it’s a helpful tool. But it’s also important not to get dependent on it.

                        I am almost married to my metronome... πŸ™ˆ

                        ShiroKuro So not only is it good to do slow practice at the end of a session, it’s also good to make your first play of that passage the next day a slow play as well.

                        I have just this morning started with that new routine!

                        *
                        ... feeling like the pianist on the Titanic ...