I ended up not being able to spend as much time on this yesterday as Iā€™d hoped, but I had a hard time with itā€¦. I also didnā€™t read it while listening to the original but Iā€™ll try to include time for that tonight, so that may help.

Itā€™s hard for me to read, but I canā€™t decide why ā€” I mention this because if I could articulate whatā€™s hard about it, you all could probably offer me advice.

I sort of fumbled through the first few pages, but tonight Iā€™ll try to zoom in on just the first page, and see if I can get the notes on the page to sound like what I hear in my head.

I think Iā€™m having a hard time reading it because Iā€™m trying to find the different lines but theyā€™re running togetherā€¦.

How many voices do you think there are? Iā€™m thinking there are three? The melody line, the bottom accompaniment and then the line in the middle, which I think of as the inner voice.

If thatā€™s right, Iā€™m wondering if it might help to practice just the melody and the bottom accompaniment line, and then the melody and the inner line, and then maybe I can ā€œhearā€ it in my head better.

Also, I am having a hard time finding the count, obviously I can count the beats on counts 1, 2, 3, 4 (that reminds me, @Rubens did you know that you didnā€™t put a time signature on the score? šŸ˜ƒ
And those beats are (mostly) easy to find for the melody line.

But where there are rests in the inner voice, I have to really stare at the notes, state at the score, to see what kind of a rest something is (i.e., 8th rest, 16th rest) and then I find Iā€™m looking really hard to match up where notes in the LH and the RH line up, and where they donā€™t. If that makes sense.

I think maybe it might be easier for me to sightread if there was one fewer measure per line and that inner voice line was spread out more. (I donā€™t mean to complain, especially since you made this score out of the kindness of your heart! But maybe if you see where Iā€™m struggling, you could offer some advice?)

Anyway, I assume that once I spend a little more time with it, that issue will dissolve.

I think I had a similar problem with September Song, because it has these inner voices and it took me sort of while to decide how to distribute some of those inner notes across the RH and LH. I think the music that is easiest to sightread is music where thereā€™s almost zero on-the-fly decision-making needed about those kinds of questions.

So hopefully, since I eventually found my way into the score for Sept Song, that means I will find my way into the score for this piece.

@Rubens if, after reading this probably incoherent message, you have any playing advice (or reading advice) please share!

Also, @rogerch Iā€™m curious what you might have to say, since youā€™re playing this without knowing the original. What tempo do you think youā€™re playing at?

That might be part of my problem, I canā€™t hear it slow in my head, but I need to play it slow for now.

    Btw hereā€™s an example of why I mean by a score thatā€™s super easy for me to sightread. This is in 5/4 time, itā€™s a score for piano and violin. Zero inner voices.

    Wind, by Brian Crain, for violin and piano:

    And hereā€™s a selection of September Song, also by Ffrench. I had a hard time sightreading this at first, but now Iā€™m playing it at tempo and hoping to have it record-ready by the end of this month.

    Hmmm, looking at Sept Song, I canā€™t decide if itā€™s easier than Miracles or notā€¦ I can play Sept Song now, so itā€™s hard to compare.

    I think Sept Song has a more obvious melody line, so that may make it easierā€¦ and fewer rests. You wouldnā€™t think rests should add difficulty, but I think they add a reading challenging (maybe only for someone like me who doesnā€™t play by ear?)

    Hereā€™s Sept Song if you want to listen:

    ShiroKuro

    Sorry you've been struggling with inner voices, I will increase your medication šŸ˜†
    Seriously I find the first page to be the most difficult in those terms, but it gets easier afterwards.
    Yes there are up to three voices in the piece, as you have observed.
    Also good observation on the lack of a time signaturešŸ˜†. This was obvious, and I rarely state the obvious, sorry.
    To learn the piece I'd advise to listen to it with the score and then learn to play it. Like playing by ear but with the score to assist you. Rogerch's approach is more advanced.
    As you can see I made a few small edits subsequently, so my apologies if you had already printed out the score before the latest edits! You can make the corrections on your sheet by hand if that's the case.

      Here's an alternate notation of the first bar, which is easier to read and would sound the same with pedal.

      Maybe I'm the one who is hearing too many voicesšŸ˜†. Too much Bach in my life.

        Rubens Sorry you've been struggling with inner voices, I will increase your medication

        šŸ¤£šŸ¤£šŸ¤£šŸ¤£šŸ¤£

        I guess I walked right into that one!!!
        šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚

        Ok Iā€™m going to work on this now (I usually practice at night so this feels like a treat! šŸŽ¶

          ShiroKuro
          Do not despair! I'd say this is slightly more difficult than September Song.

            Rubens I totally agree with this comment.

            There are always different approaches to notation when transcribing and it is entirely up to the transcriber to take whatever artistic licence they see fit. (based on preferences, experience, ease, etc.) Forgive me for mentioning that I cannot help noticing that this latest I think seems to be going more along the lines of my original attempt. Obviously I was notating at half speed (note lengths) from this and as I found out upon later re-listen, with some glaring missing notes in my haste to get something out in minimal time.

            In any case, all this is a great exercise and a lot of fun šŸ™‚
            PS I yet have to have a closer look at the completed score - life is kinda getting in the way šŸ¤Ŗ!

            Rubens ShiroKuro
            Do not despair! I'd say this is slightly more difficult than September Song.

            Interesting... I spent maybe 45 minutes on Miracles today.... and I'm thinking it's easier than Sept. Song... I'm only getting start though, let's see how I feel after working on for a week šŸ˜…

            Anyway, I had a much better time with the score today! I did listen a bit, not too much though because I'm still playing it quite slow. But I think I can now actually work on the music from the score.

            I think the reason I felt like it's a little easier than Sept Song is because today I didn't feel like it was a struggle to distribute those inner voices in Miracles between the LH and RH. Whereas when I was learning Sept Song, that was a huge struggle for me.

            Although maybe Miracles just feels easier because I can already play Sept Song and maybe I've picked up some Ffrench-esque thing that makes Miracles more accessible as a result of having played Sept. Song.... If that's true, then after working on Miracles and getting it polished, maybe next I should revisit some of the pieces in his songbook that I previously felt were too hard...

            Anyway, more to the point:

            ThankYouThankYouThankYouThankYouThankYou @Rubens I am so grateful for your score!!! Being able to work on this makes me so happy!

              Rubens Too much Bach in my life.

              Maybe that's why it was so easy for you transcribe this!!

              It makes me wonder about Ffrench's training. As far as I know, he was traditionally trained in the classical repertoire.

              ShiroKuro

              I'd say Miracles is more difficult in its first page which is quite busy with the intertwined voices, and the section that starts at bar 34, with its syncopated rhythm, but other than that it's about at the same difficulty level. I'm not usually a big fan of this kind of music but I like this piece, especially that syncopated section, exquisite. And yes, Ffrench's classic training really shows here, especially his training in Ffrench baroque. (Bad pun)

                ShiroKuro Also, @rogerch Iā€™m curious what you might have to say, since youā€™re playing this without knowing the original. What tempo do you think youā€™re playing at?

                The first two times I played through, I just forged ahead as well as I could. I didn't get the voicing right and I stumbled through the trickier rhythms. Tempo was probably half speed.

                Later in the evening I analyzed the piece some more so I could play more accurately. There were two patterns that I struggled to understand: measure 13 and others like it, and measure 37 and others like it. In both cases there is an eighth rest that I mistook for a 16th rest so there didn't seem to be enough 16th notes in the measures. Once I realized those were eighth rests it made sense.

                I worked for a while on those two patterns and then played through a couple more times paying more attention to voicing. It was a lot harder than my first read throughs. If I decide to learn this piece it's going to take a lot of time and effort (it always does! šŸ™‚). This is a lovely piece and it would be worth it!

                  rogerch

                  Yes the great syncopated parts. It may help to add barlines to divide those bars into 4 beats to learn them properly.

                  @Rubens that makes sense. I'm really enjoying your comments, they're very helpful!

                  Oh btw I forgot to say, today I forced myself to just work on measures 1 through 12 (m12 is 2nd line on page 2). So I haven't gotten to m34 yet. But yesterday, I was plodding through the whole thing and just drowning in the notes. I think that's why I found it so hard, I couldn't find the musical thoughts.

                  Today, zeroing on that section, it went much better!

                  Oh, one more btw Rubens, I'm glad you like this piece! It's been driving me crazy for a year now, wanting to play it! šŸ˜ƒ

                  Rubens Ffrench baroque.

                  šŸ˜† šŸ˜†

                  @rogerch glad to hear you're enjoying it too! I'll let you know when I move past m13. šŸ˜…

                  So, here's a question... for @Rubens and @rogerch but also anyone else who might be reading...

                  Do you think there would a benefit to spending some time analyzing this piece and maybe writing in chord names, with the goal of that being to "play the chords" rather than "play the notes"? (If you see what I mean, I don't mean I would play a block chord where something is written arpeggiated).

                  I thought I would benefit from doing that with Sept Song, but I never did and eventually I got the notes into my fingers such that now I'm playing the music of it rather than just playing the notes.

                  With Miracles, of course, I've only spent two days on it so far, so there's not really anything wrong with focusing on playing the notes at this stage.

                  But I wonder if this piece, even more than Sept Song, would benefit from that kind of approach.

                  What do you think?

                    ShiroKuro
                    My answer: absolutely.

                    I even thought of transcribing it in "fake book" version, because I believe this is how the piece was composed. Only the melody, the occasional secondary melodies,.and the harmonies are set in stone, the rest just flows with it.

                    Ok, I will try this.

                    I am such a strong reader, I never do that kind of thing.

                    I wish you had access to other scores by Ffrench, because I'd love to hear your thoughts about how this piece is different and similar to other music of his. I do think this piece, and Sept Song, were largely improvised, and I suspect that's the real reason why they haven't been included in his official score collections. But other pieces strike me as more "traditional" and their written versions seem to suggest that.

                    At the same time, he has pieces that are similar (ish) to Miracles, very flowy and chord-based, but those are included in his score books... I'm not at home right now, but I'll look later and see if there are one or two to compare....

                      ShiroKuro

                      One thing to keep in mind also is that when artists record such pieces it doesn't sound as improvised because the recordings are often edited. But if they play it live you can hear "inconsistencies" that don't take anything away from the beauty of the music.

                        ShiroKuro Do you think there would a benefit to spending some time analyzing this piece and maybe writing in chord names, with the goal of that being to "play the chords" rather than "play the notes"?

                        This sounds like a good idea to me. Not just to learn this piece, but to work on being able to instantly look at the notes and recognize the chords. I recognize simple chords when sight reading and I find it really helpful. For non-diatonic chords Iā€™m not there yet but Iā€™m working on it.