Bellyman Totally agreed! I recently went to play at my university’s piano practice rooms a couple of times. The pianos are kind of worn. The keys are uneven and it’s very easy to play loud and very difficult to play softly. I had to compensate by playing very lightly/slowly. After that, I noticed that I started to make ghost notes on my own piano.

PianogrlNW Very cool! I never thought about using the digital for practicing duets. Being able to easily record a piece in the learning process is also a big plus. My teacher suggests that I do it regularly to hear what I did right or wrong, but I haven’t been able to. Thanks!

Tuner Yamaha P525 is on my list of potentials to consider. Great to know that you like it. Thanks for sharing your experience!

I have a Yamaha grand which I quite like. It is somewhat boisterous so the household noise it generates while practicing was an issue and I was semi-consciously curtailing my practice time and also always striving to play as softly as I possibly could (do NOT do this - bad habit!!!).

Since I got my digital Kawai MP11, both my practice time and consciousness issues went away 🙂. I do love having both and you could not take either one away from me. Easy to record yourself on the digital too for those self-criticizing moments. I always find it easy to go from one to the other even though they both have different keyboard feel, but close enough not to be a serious problem.

In terms of sound and expressivity, the grand wins every time of course but the digital is surprisingly rather convincing in its imitation. But it does remain just that - an imitation.

    BartK yes, silent practice only 😅

    kanadajin Thanks for sharing your experience! My self-consciousness gets worse as it gets darker outside 😄. That’s the primary reason for me to consider getting a digital so I can practice at night.

    cheeeeee
    I think most people who try both instruments would say the P-525 has a lighter action than the ES920. But what matters most IMO is that you choose the one whose action most resembles that of your acoustic.

      Rubens I think most people who try both instruments would say the P-525 has a lighter action than the ES920. But what matters most IMO is that you choose the one whose action most resembles that of your acoustic.

      Thank you. That sounds like a great idea to help the transition between the digital and the acoustic. The action of our acoustic is on the heavier side, although it’s getting lighter (psychologically perhaps) as the new hammers break in. I may drive to the bigger city an hour away from us to try the digital pianos at a dealership.

      One thing that a decent digital keyboard has going for it is that there is some adjustment of touch available. Can't do that with an acoustic, you've got what you've got unless you wanna spend some serious coin.

      I say that with a bit of caution because generally, it's not the actual downweight or inertia of the key that's adjustable, but what happens from a feedback perspective can be altered significantly. There is a very wide range of sensitivity that is available on my Roland keyboard all the way from a very heavy feel and having to pound the keys very hard for minimal auditory reaction to a very light feel where even a light key touch will give a much more dynamic auditory reaction. (I've probably not said that quite right but hopefully you'll get the point.)

        Also keep in mind that the action of a digital piano cannot be changed. But the sound engine can easily be replaced by hooking it up to a computer. Therefore when choosing a model, it would be wise to select the one with the better action over the one with better sound.

        Playing on digital pianos of the Clavinova-type (by which I mean with that kind of action and sound, be it a slab or a cabinet) is absolutely fine. The touch weight is good enough for all practice. Let's not forget that 100 years ago pianists used to practice on silent keyboards which did not feel like pianos but had weights to mimic the touch. I honestly think that for the last 30 years - maybe even a bit longer - digital pianos have been absolutely fine for practice when it comes to learning notes especially, and refining some movements of technique. Now, you're not going to get much in the way of refined sound on an older digital, but you'll get enough to give you the vague idea. With newer digitals you can do much more refined practice. OK, it's not a grand piano and there are still big important differences but it's fine. Just be careful with how much force you are using and how much pedal you are using.

          We actually have a Clavinova, though it's an old clunker and definitely more of an entry level model (CLP-811). My memories of an actual acoustic are rusty, but so far I haven't missed anything just yet. It feels real enough, though of course my skill level is still confined to "a little less loud here and more pedal there" 😃

          The only issue I have is the very loud clack clacking of the keys, but that is probably because it's been gathering dust in the basement for more than two decades before I finally decided it was time to use it for more than just an ornament 🙂

            I use my Yamaha P515 for repetitive type practicing, learning new notes, etc. as Joseph mentioned above. Then I refine on the acoustic. I still find the acoustic is way more responsive than digitals - and depending on many factors, including weather, temperature, etc., the tone does vary from day to day.

            Bellyman One thing that a decent digital keyboard has going for it is that there is some adjustment of touch available. Can't do that with an acoustic, you've got what you've got unless you wanna spend some serious coin.

            That is cool new information to me! I wonder if this function is only available in high end digitals. It sounds like a very useful feature for people (me) trying to adapt to playing on different pianos.

            Joseph-Fleetwood Let's not forget that 100 years ago pianists used to practice on silent keyboards which did not feel like pianos but had weights to mimic the touch. I honestly think that for the last 30 years - maybe even a bit longer - digital pianos have been absolutely fine for practice when it comes to learning notes especially, and refining some movements of technique.

            We are indeed very “spoiled” when compared with pianists years ago. This reminds me of a practice method that my teacher told me, that is to imagine practicing when you don’t have a piano around, to think about the touch, feel, sound, and movements, etc. I found that pretty helpful. That would be silent practicing 😄

            Sophia The only issue I have is the very loud clack clacking of the keys, but that is probably because it's been gathering dust in the basement for more than two decades before I finally decided it was time to use it for more than just an ornament 🙂

            My university’s practice pianos (acoustic uprights) make the clacking noises too! Some keys produce louder noises than sound 😂. I don’t know if it’s because of the worn felt.

              cheeeeee Yeah, it depends on the piano and the keyboard. Some pianos have quite a lot of action / keyboard noise and so do some keyboards. But not all. Probably need to try them out and see for yourself. My older Roland keyboard and my cheap Casio keyboard are quite noisy (clickety clack) while my newer Roland keyboard is very smooth and quiet.

              cheeeeee Music colleges all over the world are full of uprights that are never regulated. The RCS in Glasgow used to have (maybe still has...) a stock of probably over 100 Welmar upright pianos that would have been fairly decent but they were just never serviced. They ranged from being extremely loud and light to being fudged up with some kind of gunk (from unwashed student hands probably - more likely humidity) and honestly I think I'd have preferred a CLP760 (Yamaha, 1990) to that.

              I hear this question all the time. First, understand there's no such thing as "feels like a piano" or "sounds like a piano". Every piano feels different and sounds different. Your piano at home isn't going to feel just like the piano in your teacher's home - even if its the same brand and model. I would ask is it a good idea to practice on an 80 year old "real" piano that is at the end of its life? Even a cheap digital would probably perform better.
              A digital piano from a top brand like Roland or Yamaha has the performance level of a good grand piano. You can also buy on brand new for about $1200. A used $1200 "real" upright piano is going to probably be 40 years old and cannot have the performance level of a good grand.
              I tell people you should think about pianos the way we do cameras.
              Most of us don't use "real" cameras where you have to put in film and learn about f-stops and shutter speed, and then get the film developed.
              Most of us use DIGITAL cameras because of all the things you can easily do to the picture.
              Did you know there is actually a Roland digital piano at Carnegie Hall? Did you know that famous concert artists have even recorded albums using it?
              If it's good enough for a concert artist - it's good enough for us "normal" people.
              FULL DISCLOSURE: I've been selling pianos for 40 years and have experienced first-hand the changes in the industry.

              Another opinion on the subject to throw in the mix:


              Enthusiastic but mediocre amateur.