Alfred Adult All-in-One Course Level 2 and 3
Nightowl Dinoraurs didn't have internet and computers... Maybe try this: https://www.musicca.com/metronome
If you get a stand-alone metronome, I strongly suggest one with a different sound for the down-beat. Mechanicals often don't provide this, and if they do, they are starting to get expensive.
WieWaldi Ah, thanks so much, that is a really easy tool to use! I might give that a try later. 
@Sophia Yep, that looks dinosaur friendly! I do like those old fashioned metronomes and it would go nicely with the cherry wood effect of my piano cabinet.
Two great options for me to consider, so no excuses for me now!
"Don't let's ask for the moon, we have the stars." (Final line from Now,Voyager, 1942)
- Edited
Hahaha I wish! That was just the photographer making us pose at the hotel where our wedding pictures were taken. In fact I completely forgot this picture even existed (it was close to two decades ago), and came across it again just the other day. Since our blues "teacher" graduated me to "lovely beginner", I decided it was time to change the little girl to a lovely (or so my husband seems to think) bride instead 
WieWaldi I was thinking, if there is a mental trick to retain the tempo.
For some people it works better to embody the beat by tapping the free foot or even just a toe. There's something with the physical movement that can make it easier to keep a steady pulse compared to just thinking about it.
About the apps. If your digital piano has bluetooth audio in, you can set it up to hear your phone's metronome in your piano's headphones or speakers. I much prefer the sound and interface of apps compared to my piano's built-in metronome.
- Edited
candela If your digital piano has bluetooth audio in
Unfortunately not. Not even Line-in. 
The successor model has BT audio, now. If I'd give any digital piano shopper a tip, it would be this.... Drum-computer, backing-track player, and a sophisticated metronome. All easy and without cables.
- Edited
I put my phone away when practicing piano. A standalone metronome is much less distracting. It is also quite a bit easier to use, whether changing tempo in small or large steps. This one by Seiko is what I have. Highly recommend it.
Speed comes from working at speed so that your brain can begin to process and recognize what's going on.
Race car drivers do not practice driving slowly so that they don't bump into each other. They train to drive fast with control of the car. They push themselves and expect a little rubbing while racing.
In the same vein, you will not get faster by playing slowly and carefully. You must push the speed limit of your fingers and expect to fumble. This is how the human brain works and you will begin to correct the fumbles automatically. Eventually you will stop fumbling and can control the speed at which you play.
Just like a race car driver controls the speed at which he drives..
- Edited
Well, it's interesting that you mentioned a race car driver though - because of all people, a racer can't afford to fumble at all. He fumbles, he dies. So although I agree with what you're saying (we need to push ourselves to go a little faster than our comfort zone), it's no use speeding it up to the point of fumbling. I think the trick is to stay just within the "no-fumble" zone until it becomes the "whoa I feel like a tortoise" zone and then crank up the speed a notch. Rinse, repeat
By doing that my current piece is now at the 70bpm "fumble? what the heck is that?", 80bpm "here are my fumble zones" and 100bpm "are these weirdly flailing objects moving in the general direction of the correct keys really my fingers controlled by my brain?" But give it a week or two and I will probably be able to give a different report 
Would it be an idea to split these last few posts into your new thread?
Well, I'm happy to say I am moving on from A Classy Rag because I got a recording done today - practice pays off There were a few pieces I got up to about 60-80% okay-ish (I will polish those later), so that means I'm now ready to move on to the unfinished symphony (Schubert). I'm looking forward to that one - it's like the classical version of a boogie woogie or ragtime piece
Sophia, you are really zooming through book 3! I'm still moving through book 2 at snail speed, but I think this is quite common at this stage. I have been working on the Elgar piece for a few days, and have made a tentative start with Dark Eyes, but both pieces are stretching my skills as they include fiendishly tricky two part writing for the right hand. The Chopin piece is next, and I've briefly attempted RH notes, but I'm not ready to properly tackle it yet.
I really don't think I'll progress further than grade 2 or 3 - I don't think my old brain is up to the level of multi-tasking involved beyond that level. I foresee that complex pieces probably involve 2 part writing for BOTH hands - the thought is terrifying! I will play for pleasure at an intermediate[ish] level but not become a slave to piano.
"Don't let's ask for the moon, we have the stars." (Final line from Now,Voyager, 1942)
Nightowl I really don't think I'll progress further than grade 2 or 3
Well, you say that now, but remember when we were in book 1? I listened to some people perform pieces from the second book and I thought I'd NEVER be able to play that. And here we are today - playing them. Sure, not as well as the professionals, but then again they once were where we are now. I agree with not becoming a slave to piano but I do think that as long as we keep at it regularly, we have no choice but to become better at it
I think the real fun starts when we allow ourselves to get away from Alfred dictating what we play and start picking music that we LIKE to play. Every now and then Alfred has such a piece, but nowhere near often enough. Though this third book is a little more pleasant than the first two - and I'm allowing myself to gloss over over pieces that I don't care for a little more often now. As long as I'm able to keep up with what the book is trying to teach, I'm okay with it now.
We'll see, but I'm not picking things up quickly now, and I can't imagine wanting to spend 100 hours to master a grade 5 piece, which is what might be entailed at that level. The professionals make it look so easy, and so effortless, but some of them have been playing for DECADES! Not that I'm being defeatist, just keeping my expectations real.
"Don't let's ask for the moon, we have the stars." (Final line from Now,Voyager, 1942)
- Edited
Nightowl I'm not picking things up quickly now, and I can't imagine wanting to spend 100 hours to master a grade 5 piece
But that is actually not how it works You're not picking new pieces up more quickly, true. But you're picking up MORE DIFFICULT pieces just as quickly as you picked up the easy pieces in your earlier days. That is the beauty of following a method book - it eases us into playing more and more complicated stuff gradually enough that it doesn't feel like progress.
If you picked up a grade 5 piece today, it would take you 100 hours to master. But once we gradually reach grade 5, it will take you just 2 or 3 weeks, same as a piece such as HN took you two weeks. If you had tried HN a year ago, you'd still be picking it out today - that is why we need to learn pieces at our own skill level. Something all the method books are good at
Ok, that was me going into full lecture mode for once, lol. Back to regular 
mode so you'll know me again
Fair point Sophia. But I still doubt that I will progress beyond grade 3(ish) level - I'm too much of a plodder and I think my brain doesn't operate fast enough to go beyond that. I speak slower than average - it takes me a bit of time to formulate my words and thoughts. Hence my belief that I won't ever be able to play fast tempo, complex pieces, because my brain doesn't "do" speed! It works OK, just not quickly enough for that.
"Don't let's ask for the moon, we have the stars." (Final line from Now,Voyager, 1942)